Satellite
playground
This simulation shows
the orbits of three satellites around the Earth
(how
to edit orbits):
| - | a geostationary satellite has a circular orbit in the plane of the Earth's equator. It is just the right distance from the Earth that it orbits at the same angular speed that the Earth rotates - so it stays above exactly the same spot on the equator; |
| - | a satellite with a very low and fast circular orbit that takes it over the Earth's pole. As the Earth rotates, the satellite flies over a different part of the Earth on each orbit. Spy satellites might use such an orbit; |
| - | a satellite with an elliptical orbit in the plane of the Earth's equator. |
The simulation gives
two simultaneous views of the Earth and satellites; a 3D view (from an adjustable
point in space - or from any of the satellites) and a selection of plane
views (top, front or side).
The plane views show the velocity (blue arrows) and acceleration (green arrows)
of the satellites. The acceleration of the satellites is always towards the
centre of the Earth. The acceleration and velocity of a satellite is higher
the closer it is to the Earth.
To change the orbit of any satellite,
pause the
simulation
, then
use the mouse on any the the plane views (top, front or side) to move the
satellite or alter its velocity. (Try to avoid moving the Earth by
mistake.)
Experiment changing the trajectory of one of the satellites - then watch
what happens. You'll get an especially good view from the satellite itself!
Once you've changed a satellite's orbit, the label it started out with may
longer be true, and it might even hit the Earth or escape its gravitational
pull altogether.
Whatever happens, clicking the "rewind" button will return the simulation
to its original state.
The energy and orbital period of the satellite in the elliptical orbit is
shown in a scrolling graph. While the satellite moves closer to the Earth
its gravitational potential energy is converted into kinetic energy. As it
moves away from the Earth the kinetic energy is converted back to
gravitational
potential energy. All the while the total KE+PE remains constant.
As long as the satellite's total energy is less than zero, it will remain
in a closed orbit around the Earth [providing it doesn't crash into it, or
get diverted by another object in the Solar System].
If you adjust the satellite's position and/or velocity so that its total
energy is greater than zero - then it will completely escape the Earth's
gravitational pull.
Two factors (not taken into account in this simulation) diminish the long
term stability of a satellite's orbit;
| - | at low orbits, the air friction of the thin remnants of the atmosphere will slow satellites down so that they spiral lower and lower - eventually burning up in the atmosphere or crashing into the Earth; |
| - | the pull of the Earth's equatorial bulge, the Sun and the Moon, will cause the axis of a satellite's orbit to precece like a top [as does the Earth's axis (once every 26 000 years) and the axis of the Moon's orbit (once every 18.6 years) ] |
Note:
Watching the view from the polar satellite,
you'll notice the view switch around each time the satellite passes over
either pole. This happens because the camera adjusts to try to keep the North
pole uppermost in the picture.
Notice that the satellite's gravitational potential
energy is always registered as negative - below the horizontal "zero" line
on the graph. This is because, by convention, we say that the gravitational
potential energy between two objects is zero when they are an infinite distance
apart. Since this is also their maximum potential energy, the potential energy
for objects a finite distance apart is less than zero.
This may seem confusing, but it is actually the simplest way of defining
gravitational potential energy. Otherwise we'd have to specify some arbitrary
separation for zero PE, and we'd have to deal with both positive and negative
PE